integrator settlement comparison Record Keeping

How to Compare an Integrator Settlement with Your Farm Records

Integrators such as Tyson, Perdue, Pilgrim's, Mountaire, Fieldale, Wayne Farms, and Koch Foods compute settlement sheets on their own systems from their own data. Your records are the only independent measurement of the same flock — this page is the line-by-line method for checking the claims against them.

How to Compare an Integrator Settlement with Your Farm Records

Every integrator settlement sheet is a set of claims about your flock: how many birds went to the plant, at what average weight, at what feed conversion relative to the complex, with what mortality. Growers working with major US integrators — Tyson, Perdue, Pilgrim's, Mountaire, Fieldale, Wayne Farms, Koch Foods — receive these numbers on the integrator's systems and rarely see the arithmetic behind them. The comparison in this page is how you check those claims against your own records, line by line, with the documentation that turns a disagreement into a conversation instead of an argument. PoultryLog exists to keep the grower's side of that comparison.

What this page is: A reconciliation method — pull your records, normalize them to the settlement's terms, compare line by line, and document variances. Settlement structures vary by integrator and by contract, so the line items below are the categories to reconcile, not a promise about any specific company's sheet. Never share your PoultryLog credentials with anyone; the comparison uses your records, not access to them.

What a Settlement Sheet Typically Contains

Exact line items differ by integrator and contract, but US broiler settlement sheets generally reconcile these categories:

Settlement Line What It Claims Your Record That Checks It
Birds placed / grownStarting population for the flockChick placement records, house entry counts
Birds deliveredCount sent to the plantCatch records, exit counts by house and date
Average live weightMean weight of delivered birdsWeekly sample weights, catch-weight records
Total live poundsBirds × average weightExit counts × your recorded averages
Mortality and cullsLosses during the grow-outDaily mortality logs with dates and causes
Feed conversion ratioFCR relative to the complex averageFeed delivered tickets vs weight gained (FCR method)
Feed conversion premium/discountPay adjustment for FCR positionYour FCR vs the stated complex average
Quality or grade adjustmentsCondemnations, grades, defectsPlant receiving records you were given
Fuel or environmental adjustmentsContract-specific additionsContract terms, your energy logs where applicable
Total settlement payWhat the flock earnedSum of the above against your break-even price

The Comparison Method, Step by Step

  1. Pull your records for the same window as the settlement. Exit counts by house and date, weekly sample weights with dates, mortality logs, and feed delivery tickets for the flock period. If a record does not exist, note that as a gap — an unrecorded line cannot be reconciled, and knowing which lines you cannot check is part of the audit.
  2. Normalize units and dates before comparing anything. Pounds vs kilograms, live vs dressed weight, bird-day counting differences, and which week the settlement assigns a mortality to — most "discrepancies" dissolve at this step. Confirm which average weight basis the sheet uses (delivered birds only, or placed birds).
  3. Compare the population chain first. Placed → alive at catch → delivered. If placed matches and delivered does not, the variance is in mortality or catch handling, not in pricing. If delivered matches but average weight does not, the variance is in the weight record — your samples vs the plant scale.
  4. Recheck FCR arithmetic yourself. Feed consumed (delivered minus feed remaining in bins) ÷ weight gained (delivered birds × average weight − placement weight). Compare your number to the sheet's, then compare both to the complex average the premium is calculated against. The feed consumption chart gives the expected intake curve for your strain and age.
  5. Quantify each variance in dollars before raising it. A 0.02 FCR difference on a 30,000-bird flock to 6.4 lb is roughly 3,800 lb of feed — at $0.50/lb, about $1,900. A 0.1 lb average-weight difference is 2,910 lb of live weight. Write the dollar figure next to the line: it decides which variances are worth escalating and which are rounding.
  6. Escalate with records attached, not with memory. Send the specific line, your computed figure, and the dated source records behind it — exit counts, weight logs, feed tickets. The growers who win these conversations bring documents, not frustration.

Common Variances and What They Usually Mean

Variance Usual Cause Your Move
Delivered count differs by a few birdsCatch crew counting, transfer between housesReconcile against exit counts per house; small, documented gaps are normal
Average weight differs by 0.1–0.3 lbSample timing, plant scale vs hand scale, partial-day catchCompare your sample protocol to the catch time; weigh a follow-up sample the same day
Mortality dated differentlyWeek-boundary assignment, culls counted separatelyRebuild the mortality curve by date from your logs and show the timing
FCR differs from your calculationFeed remaining in bins uncounted, delivered weight vs consumed weightWeigh bin contents at catch; recalculate with consumed feed, not delivered feed
Premium/discount does not match expected positionComplex average used may differ from the published figure you assumedAsk the integrator for the complex average and period used in the calculation
A whole category is missing from the sheetContract terms, regional practiceCheck your contract; request the basis in writing

Why the Independent Record Wins

An integrator's sheet is computed on integrator systems from integrator data — weight scales, catch records, plant receiving. Your records are the only independent measurement of the same flock. When the two agree, the settlement is verified, not just received. When they disagree, the grower with dated, house-level records has something the other side does not: a second measurement of the same events. That is the entire value of the comparison — not suspicion of the integrator, but verification of the flock.

The habit that makes this possible is unglamorous: daily mortality with timestamps, weekly sample weights with dates, feed tickets entered the day they arrive. See the audit-ready records guide for the same discipline applied to compliance, and the tournament guide for how independent records change competitive conversations.

Running the Comparison in Poultry Log

Poultry Log keeps exit counts, weekly sample weights, mortality with dates, and feed deliveries against each flock — which means the population chain, the weight record, and the FCR inputs exist in one place before the settlement arrives rather than being reconstructed from memory afterward. The settlement calculator runs your numbers against the sheet's claims; the break-even price supplies the line below which the flock lost money regardless of what the comparison finds. Together they turn settlement day from a moment of faith into a five-minute check.

Revision log:
  • 2026-10-05: Initial version. Line-item reconciliation table, six-step comparison method, common-variance table, and independent-record rationale.
Direct answer

How do you verify an integrator settlement sheet?

Pull your records for the settlement window — exit counts by house, weekly sample weights, mortality logs, feed tickets — normalize units and dates, then reconcile the population chain first (placed → alive → delivered), recheck FCR arithmetic with bin-remaining feed, and quantify each variance in dollars before escalating it with dated source records attached.

Reconcile the population chain first: placed, alive at catch, delivered — it localizes every other variance.

Recalculate FCR with consumed feed (delivered minus bin remaining), not delivered feed.

Quantify each variance in dollars: 0.02 FCR on 30,000 birds to 6.4 lb is roughly $1,900 at $0.50/lb feed.

Escalate with documents, not memory: the line, your computed figure, and the dated records behind it.

Comparison

Paper records vs Poultry Log for Compare Integrator Settlement with Farm Records |

Paper and spreadsheets can store integrator settlement comparison data, but they rarely show which house, flock, or expense is actually costing money.

Farm need Paper or spreadsheet Poultry Log
Reconcile the population chain first: placed, alive at catch, delivered — it localizes every other variance.
Scattered across notebooks and hard to find when needed.
Logs and trends stay connected to the house and flock where they happened.
Recalculate FCR with consumed feed (delivered minus bin remaining), not delivered feed.
Requires manual calculation and cross-referencing.
Automatic calculations and cross-referencing between data types.
Quantify each variance in dollars: 0.02 FCR on 30,000 birds to 6.4 lb is roughly $1,900 at $0.50/lb feed.
Easy to start but difficult to analyze across multiple flocks.
Structured data that can be analyzed across flocks and houses.
Escalate with documents, not memory: the line, your computed figure, and the dated records behind it.
No connection between this data and financial outcomes.
Ties directly to expense and settlement records for profitability view.
Poultry Log

Start building farm records that explain performance.